❗ Problem: “Why Do I Keep Getting Surprised by Outcomes?”
Have you ever made a decision that seemed smart, only to watch it collapse because you didn’t anticipate how someone else would react?
This is what happens when you don’t think sequentially — when you make your move without considering the moves that follow.
Most people:
- Focus only on the next step.
- React emotionally.
- Get surprised, outplayed, or trapped.
But here’s the truth:
In life, the smartest move often happens three steps before the win.
✅ Solution: Think Like a Strategist, Not a Reactor
In game theory, sequential games are decision-making situations where players act in turns — each reacting to what came before.
The pros use backward induction:
They start from the end and work backward to determine the best first move.
This is how:
- Chess players plan several moves ahead.
- Poker players anticipate emotional cues, bluffing, and hidden information.
You can do both.
♟️ Chess vs ♠️ Poker: The Two Types of Sequential Play
| Concept | Chess | Poker |
| Info | Perfect | Imperfect |
| Emotions | Low | High |
| Planning | Logical, visible | Risky, psychological |
| Analogy | Job promotion, structured negotiations | Co-parenting, dating, sales |
Key insight:
You can apply chess-like logic to your own decisions…
but you’ll need poker-like intuition to deal with people who don’t show all their cards.
🔧 3 Actionable Steps to Think Like a Pro
1. Start at the End
Ask:
What is the best possible outcome? What does “winning” look like here?
Define that first. That’s your “checkmate” or final chip stack.
Then work backward from there.
2. Predict the Reactions
Map it out like this:
- If I do X, they’ll likely do Y.
- Then I’ll do Z.
- Where does that leave us?
If you know the likely responses, you’re not reacting — you’re guiding.
3. Plan for Both Logic and Emotion
Some people will respond rationally (like chess).
Others will bluff, fold early, or act out of fear (like poker).
Make two versions of your plan:
- One for logic-based outcomes.
- One for emotional or chaotic players.
🧠 Real-Life Example: Business Pitch
You’re presenting a new project to your team.
Most people say:
“Let me share the idea and see what they think.”
That’s playing checkers.
But a strategist asks:
- What will my team’s biggest objection be?
- Who will likely push back emotionally?
- What’s the best order to introduce each point?
They start at the end — “Team agrees and feels excited” —
and walk backward through:
- Data they’ll need.
- Resistance they’ll meet.
- The emotional hooks they must land.
That’s chess and poker, together.
🔥 Mini Q&A: Build Your Strategic Thinking Muscle
Q1:
Do you ever rush into action, then later say: “I didn’t expect them to react that way…”?
→ Start using backward induction before you move.
Q2:
Are you better at planning logic (chess) or reading emotion (poker)?
→ Most people default to one. Strengthen both.
Q3:
What’s one decision you’re facing right now?
→ What’s the likely endgame — and how can you reverse-engineer your way there?
💡 Bonus Section: Launching a New Product — How Sequential Thinking Prevents Failure
Scenario:
You’re planning to launch a new product — maybe a fitness coaching program, a mobile app, or a niche supplement line.
You’re excited, motivated, and ready to go.
But you also know: Most launches flop, not because the product is bad — but because the strategy was reactive, not predictive.
🎯 How to Use Sequential Thinking to Build a Winning Launch
Instead of charging forward and “figuring it out as you go,” let’s walk through backward induction — step by step — to reverse-engineer a high-impact launch.
🧠 Step 1: Define the Endgame First
Ask:
What does a successful launch look like?
Example:
- 100 paying users within 30 days
- $10,000 in collected revenue
- Strong testimonials and momentum for the next release
Be brutally specific. General goals (“get traction”) lead to fuzzy action.
🔁 Step 2: Work Backward From That Goal
If you want 100 sales in 30 days, what must happen just before that?
- You need ~500 warm leads (assuming 20% conversion)
- That means you need ~1000 engaged visitors to your landing page
- That means you need at least 2–4 weeks of valuable content, conversations, or inbound marketing
- Which means you must start building attention before you start selling
So your timeline changes — not based on motivation, but on logic.
🎯 Step 3: Anticipate Real-World Reactions (Poker Thinking)
Now add emotional realism:
- Some people will ghost.
- Some will say “interested” and never buy.
- Others will ask 10 questions and still need proof.
- Friends might “support” you with likes — but not with money.
These are normal friction points.
So you design countermoves:
- Preempt objections with a killer FAQ
- Show social proof early
- Build urgency with time-based bonuses or limited spots
- Follow up 2–3 times post-launch (don’t expect one email to do the job)
🛠️ Step 4: Lock In a Sequence, Not Just a Launch Date
Instead of focusing on “launch day,” focus on a sequence of moves:
- Problem education phase (build awareness of the need)
- Tease and warm up (behind-the-scenes, stories, “coming soon” posts)
- Pre-sale offer or waitlist
- Launch + Objection handling
- Follow-up with testimonials, results, and next steps
Each move sets up the next. You’re playing a 5-turn game, not just a single shot.
📈 Why This Works
✅ You avoid rushing
✅ You see the terrain before you move
✅ You anticipate confusion, resistance, and distraction
✅ You build momentum instead of chasing it
Result:
Even if you miss your target, you know why and where to tweak — because you saw the path before you walked it.
That’s what makes the next launch better — and the next one stronger.
🧠 Takeaway:
Most creators launch like gamblers.
Strategists launch like players who’ve already seen the game played 100 times.
Plan your product like a chessboard.
Launch it like a poker hand.
And move through each step like a professional.
About Author
